Can A Lawyer Be Charged With Obstruction Of Justice?

Can a lawyer be charged with obstruction of justice? Yes, a lawyer can indeed be charged with obstruction of justice if they willfully impede or obstruct the due process of justice, providing a ground for disciplinary action. At internetlawyers.net, we shed light on this complex legal issue. Understanding the nuances of obstruction of justice, legal ethics, and attorney misconduct is vital for both legal professionals and the public.

1. What Constitutes Obstruction of Justice for a Lawyer?

Yes, obstruction of justice for a lawyer occurs when they intentionally interfere with a criminal investigation, court proceeding, or other legal process. Such actions undermine the integrity of the legal system and can result in serious legal consequences.

Obstruction of justice encompasses a range of activities, including:

• Tampering with Evidence: Altering, concealing, or destroying evidence relevant to a case.
• Witness Tampering: Influencing, intimidating, or threatening witnesses to change their testimony or withhold information.
• Lying to Investigators: Providing false statements or misleading information to law enforcement or other investigative bodies.
• Obstructing Court Orders: Disobeying or hindering the enforcement of court orders.
• Abuse of Legal Authority: Using one’s position as a lawyer to improperly influence or impede a legal process.

These actions are not only illegal but also violate the ethical obligations of attorneys, potentially leading to disciplinary measures.

2. What Federal Statutes Apply to Lawyers and Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, several federal statutes address obstruction of justice and apply to lawyers, including 18 U.S. Code § 1503, 18 U.S. Code § 1512, and 18 U.S. Code § 1519. These laws prohibit specific actions aimed at obstructing justice and are crucial in maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings.

• 18 U.S. Code § 1503 – Influencing or Injuring Officer or Juror Generally: This statute prohibits influencing, intimidating, or impeding any officer of the court, juror, or witness in any federal court proceeding. It covers a broad range of actions aimed at obstructing the administration of justice.
• 18 U.S. Code § 1512 – Tampering with a Witness, Victim, or an Informant: This section focuses on acts of witness tampering, including intimidating, threatening, or corruptly persuading a witness, victim, or informant to withhold information or provide false testimony.
• 18 U.S. Code § 1519 – Destruction, Alteration, or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations and Bankruptcy: This statute makes it a crime to alter, destroy, mutilate, conceal, or cover up any record or document with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence a federal investigation or bankruptcy proceeding.

These statutes provide a legal framework for prosecuting individuals, including lawyers, who engage in activities that obstruct justice. The application of these laws ensures accountability and helps maintain the integrity of the legal system.

3. Can Lying to Investigators Lead to Obstruction of Justice Charges?

Yes, lying to investigators can indeed lead to obstruction of justice charges under federal law. Providing false statements or misleading information to federal investigators is a serious offense that undermines the integrity of the investigation process.

Under 18 U.S. Code § 1001, it is a crime to knowingly and willfully make false statements or conceal material facts in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the U.S. government. This statute is frequently used to prosecute individuals who lie to federal investigators, including FBI agents, IRS agents, and other law enforcement officials.

For a false statement to result in obstruction of justice charges, it must be material, meaning it has the potential to influence the investigation. Additionally, the individual making the false statement must have done so knowingly and willfully, with the intent to deceive or mislead the investigators.

Many lawyers have faced obstruction of justice charges for making false statements to investigators. The consequences of such charges can be severe, including imprisonment, fines, and damage to one’s professional reputation.

4. What Are Examples of Attorney Misconduct That Could Lead to Obstruction Charges?

Yes, attorney misconduct that can lead to obstruction charges includes tampering with evidence, witness tampering, and abuse of legal authority. These actions undermine the legal process and are subject to severe penalties.

Here are some specific examples:

1. Tampering with Evidence:

   • Altering or destroying documents relevant to a case.
   • Concealing physical evidence that could incriminate a client.
   • Submitting fabricated evidence to the court.

2. Witness Tampering:

   • Intimidating or threatening witnesses to change their testimony.
   • Offering bribes or other incentives to influence a witness’s statement.
   • Advising a witness to withhold information from investigators.

3. Abuse of Legal Authority:

   • Using one’s position as an attorney to improperly influence a judge or other court official.
   • Filing frivolous lawsuits or motions to harass or delay an opponent.
   • Misusing confidential information obtained during legal proceedings.

4. Lying to the Court or Investigators:

   • Making false statements to a judge or jury.
   • Submitting false affidavits or declarations.
   • Misleading investigators about a client’s involvement in a crime.

These examples illustrate the types of misconduct that can result in obstruction charges and highlight the importance of ethical conduct for attorneys.

5. How Does Obstruction of Justice Impact a Lawyer’s Career?

Yes, obstruction of justice can severely impact a lawyer’s career, leading to disbarment, criminal charges, and damage to reputation. These consequences can effectively end a legal career and have long-lasting personal and professional repercussions.

The consequences of obstruction of justice for a lawyer can be devastating and far-reaching:

• Disbarment: One of the most severe consequences is disbarment, which means the lawyer loses their license to practice law. This effectively ends their legal career.
• Criminal Charges: Obstruction of justice is a criminal offense, and a lawyer convicted of such charges can face imprisonment, fines, and a criminal record.
• Reputational Damage: Even if a lawyer is not convicted of a crime, being accused of obstruction of justice can severely damage their reputation. Clients may be hesitant to hire a lawyer who has been accused of unethical or illegal behavior, and colleagues may lose trust and respect.
• Professional Sanctions: In addition to disbarment, a lawyer may face other professional sanctions, such as suspension of their license, censure, or mandatory ethics training.
• Loss of Employment: A lawyer accused of obstruction of justice may be terminated from their law firm or government agency.
• Difficulty Finding Future Employment: Even after serving a prison sentence or completing a suspension, a lawyer may find it difficult to find future employment in the legal field.
• Personal and Financial Hardship: The stress and shame of being accused of obstruction of justice can take a toll on a lawyer’s personal life, leading to financial hardship, relationship problems, and mental health issues.

The American Bar Association (ABA) provides guidance on ethical standards for attorneys, and violations can lead to disciplinary actions.

6. What Defenses Might a Lawyer Use Against Obstruction Charges?

Yes, a lawyer facing obstruction charges might use defenses such as lack of intent, misinterpretation of actions, or insufficient evidence. These defenses aim to challenge the prosecution’s case and demonstrate that the lawyer did not intentionally obstruct justice.

Here are some common defenses a lawyer might use:

1. Lack of Intent: The lawyer argues that they did not intend to obstruct justice. For example, they may claim that they made a mistake or that their actions were misinterpreted.
2. Misinterpretation of Actions: The lawyer argues that their actions were not meant to obstruct justice but were part of their legal representation of a client. They may claim that they were zealously advocating for their client’s interests within the bounds of the law.
3. Insufficient Evidence: The lawyer argues that the prosecution does not have enough evidence to prove that they committed obstruction of justice. They may challenge the credibility of witnesses or the admissibility of evidence.
4. Good Faith Belief: The lawyer argues that they acted in good faith and believed that their actions were legal and ethical. They may claim that they relied on the advice of other attorneys or legal experts.
5. Entrapment: The lawyer argues that they were entrapped by law enforcement or government agents into committing obstruction of justice. They may claim that they were induced or coerced into taking actions that they would not have otherwise taken.
6. Constitutional Violations: The lawyer argues that their constitutional rights were violated during the investigation or prosecution. For example, they may claim that they were subjected to an illegal search or seizure, or that they were denied the right to counsel.

These defenses can be complex and depend on the specific circumstances of the case. Successfully using these defenses often requires a skilled and experienced criminal defense attorney.

7. How Do Ethical Rules and Professional Responsibility Relate to Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, ethical rules and professional responsibility are critical in preventing obstruction of justice. Attorneys are required to act with honesty, integrity, and candor, and must not engage in any conduct that undermines the legal process.

The relationship between ethical rules, professional responsibility, and obstruction of justice is multifaceted:

• Duty of Candor: Attorneys have a duty of candor to the court, which means they must be honest and truthful in their dealings with the court and must not knowingly make false statements or misrepresent facts.
• Duty of Confidentiality: Attorneys have a duty to protect their clients’ confidential information, but this duty is not absolute. Attorneys are not allowed to use confidential information to further a crime or fraud, including obstruction of justice.
• Duty of Zealous Advocacy: Attorneys have a duty to zealously advocate for their clients’ interests, but this duty is limited by ethical rules and the law. Attorneys are not allowed to engage in illegal or unethical conduct in the name of zealous advocacy.
• Duty to Uphold the Law: Attorneys have a duty to uphold the law and the integrity of the legal system. This means they must not engage in any conduct that undermines the administration of justice, including obstruction of justice.

Violations of these ethical rules can result in disciplinary action, including suspension or disbarment. Attorneys who engage in obstruction of justice may also face criminal charges.

The American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct provide a framework for ethical conduct by attorneys and serve as a guide for state bar associations in developing their own ethical rules.

8. What Is the Role of the Bar Association in Cases of Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, the Bar Association plays a significant role in cases of obstruction of justice by investigating ethical violations, conducting disciplinary proceedings, and imposing sanctions on attorneys found guilty of misconduct.

The Bar Association’s role can be summarized as follows:

1. Investigating Ethical Violations: The Bar Association is responsible for investigating complaints of ethical misconduct against attorneys, including allegations of obstruction of justice.
2. Conducting Disciplinary Proceedings: If the Bar Association finds sufficient evidence of ethical misconduct, it will conduct disciplinary proceedings to determine whether the attorney violated the rules of professional conduct.
3. Imposing Sanctions: If the attorney is found guilty of ethical misconduct, the Bar Association has the authority to impose sanctions, which may include suspension of the attorney’s license, disbarment, or other disciplinary measures.
4. Providing Guidance and Education: The Bar Association also plays a role in providing guidance and education to attorneys on ethical issues, including obstruction of justice.
5. Protecting the Public: The Bar Association’s primary goal is to protect the public by ensuring that attorneys adhere to ethical standards and that those who violate those standards are held accountable.

9. Are There Specific Cases Where Lawyers Have Been Charged with Obstruction?

Yes, there have been several high-profile cases where lawyers have been charged with obstruction of justice, highlighting the serious consequences of such actions. These cases serve as cautionary tales and emphasize the importance of ethical conduct within the legal profession.

Here are a few notable examples:

1. Michael Cohen: The former personal attorney for Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, was charged with and pleaded guilty to making false statements to Congress, among other charges. These false statements were made during testimony before the House Intelligence Committee and were related to the timing of the Trump Tower Moscow project. Cohen’s actions were seen as an attempt to obstruct the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
2. Aaron Swartz: Although not a lawyer, Aaron Swartz’s case is relevant due to its implications for computer fraud and abuse. Swartz, a computer programmer and Internet activist, was charged with multiple felonies for downloading academic articles from JSTOR. While the charges were not strictly “obstruction of justice,” his actions were seen as interfering with the legal and contractual agreements of JSTOR, leading to federal charges that were highly controversial. The case was eventually dropped after Swartz’s death.
3. Monica Goodling: Monica Goodling, a former Justice Department official, was investigated for her role in the politically motivated firing of several U.S. attorneys. While she was not charged with obstruction of justice, she admitted to misleading the Justice Department’s internal investigators, which raised questions about potential obstruction.
4. Richard Scruggs: A prominent trial lawyer, Richard Scruggs, was charged and convicted of conspiring to bribe a judge in Mississippi in an attempt to influence a legal case. His actions constituted obstruction of justice because they directly interfered with the fair and impartial administration of justice.

These cases underscore the importance of upholding ethical standards and the potential consequences of engaging in conduct that obstructs justice.

Alt: A lawyer in a suit and tie sits across from their client, reviewing documents and discussing legal strategies to help the client understand the implications of obstruction of justice charges.

10. How Can a Lawyer Avoid Obstruction of Justice Charges?

Yes, to avoid obstruction of justice charges, a lawyer must maintain honesty, integrity, and transparency in all their actions, and adhere strictly to ethical guidelines and legal standards.

Here are some specific steps lawyers can take to avoid obstruction of justice charges:

1. Know the Law: Lawyers should have a thorough understanding of the laws related to obstruction of justice, including federal statutes such as 18 U.S. Code § 1503, 18 U.S. Code § 1512, and 18 U.S. Code § 1519.
2. Adhere to Ethical Rules: Lawyers should strictly adhere to the ethical rules and professional standards of their jurisdiction, as well as the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
3. Maintain Honesty and Candor: Lawyers should always be honest and candid in their dealings with the court, clients, and other parties. They should avoid making false statements or misrepresenting facts.
4. Avoid Tampering with Evidence: Lawyers should never alter, destroy, or conceal evidence relevant to a case. They should also avoid submitting fabricated evidence to the court.
5. Refrain from Witness Tampering: Lawyers should never intimidate, threaten, or influence witnesses to change their testimony or withhold information.
6. Respect Court Orders: Lawyers should always respect and comply with court orders. They should avoid any actions that could be seen as obstructing the enforcement of court orders.
7. Avoid Abuse of Legal Authority: Lawyers should never use their position or authority to improperly influence a judge, jury, or other court official.
8. Seek Guidance: Lawyers should seek guidance from ethics experts or bar associations if they are unsure about the ethical implications of a particular action.
9. Document Everything: Lawyers should keep detailed records of all their actions and communications related to a case. This can help demonstrate that they acted in good faith and did not intend to obstruct justice.
10. Report Misconduct: Lawyers have a duty to report ethical misconduct by other attorneys. If a lawyer becomes aware of another attorney engaging in obstruction of justice, they should report it to the appropriate authorities.

By following these steps, lawyers can minimize the risk of facing obstruction of justice charges and maintain their integrity and reputation within the legal profession.

11. How Does the Duty of Confidentiality Affect Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, the duty of confidentiality can create complex situations in obstruction of justice cases. While lawyers must protect client confidences, this duty does not extend to concealing or participating in ongoing or future criminal activity.

The interplay between the duty of confidentiality and obstruction of justice involves several key considerations:

• Limits to Confidentiality: The duty of confidentiality is not absolute. Attorneys are not allowed to use confidential information to further a crime or fraud, including obstruction of justice.
• Disclosure Obligations: In some cases, attorneys may have a legal or ethical obligation to disclose confidential information if it is necessary to prevent a crime or fraud.
• Balancing Duties: Attorneys must carefully balance their duty of confidentiality with their duty to uphold the law and the integrity of the legal system.
• Seeking Guidance: Attorneys should seek guidance from ethics experts or bar associations if they are unsure about how to handle a situation involving confidential information and potential obstruction of justice.
• Case Law and Ethical Rules: The specific rules and case law governing the duty of confidentiality vary by jurisdiction, so attorneys should be familiar with the rules in their jurisdiction.

12. What Are the Potential Penalties for a Lawyer Convicted of Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, the penalties for a lawyer convicted of obstruction of justice can be severe, including imprisonment, fines, disbarment, and damage to professional reputation. These penalties reflect the seriousness of the offense and the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal system.

Here’s a breakdown of the potential penalties:

• Imprisonment: Obstruction of justice is a criminal offense, and a lawyer convicted of such charges can face imprisonment. The length of the prison sentence will depend on the specific charges, the severity of the obstruction, and the lawyer’s prior criminal record.
• Fines: In addition to imprisonment, a lawyer convicted of obstruction of justice may be required to pay fines. The amount of the fine will also depend on the specific charges and the severity of the obstruction.
• Disbarment: One of the most severe consequences for a lawyer convicted of obstruction of justice is disbarment. This means the lawyer loses their license to practice law and is no longer allowed to represent clients or appear in court.
• Reputational Damage: Even if a lawyer is not convicted of a crime, being accused of obstruction of justice can severely damage their reputation. Clients may be hesitant to hire a lawyer who has been accused of unethical or illegal behavior, and colleagues may lose trust and respect.

These penalties can have a devastating impact on a lawyer’s career and personal life.

13. How Is “Intent” Proven in Obstruction of Justice Cases Involving Lawyers?

Yes, proving “intent” in obstruction of justice cases involving lawyers is crucial and often challenging. Prosecutors must demonstrate that the lawyer acted with the specific intent to obstruct, impede, or influence a legal proceeding.

Proving intent in these cases often involves circumstantial evidence, as direct evidence of a lawyer’s intent may be difficult to obtain. Here are some common methods used to prove intent:

1. Circumstantial Evidence: Prosecutors often rely on circumstantial evidence to prove intent. This may include evidence of the lawyer’s actions, statements, and conduct leading up to and during the alleged obstruction.
2. Motive: Evidence of the lawyer’s motive for obstructing justice can be used to infer intent. For example, if the lawyer had a personal or financial interest in the outcome of the case, this may suggest that they had a motive to obstruct justice.
3. Knowledge: Prosecutors must prove that the lawyer knew that their actions would obstruct justice. This may involve evidence that the lawyer was aware of the relevant laws and regulations, and that they understood the consequences of their actions.
4. Pattern of Conduct: Evidence of a pattern of conduct may be used to show that the lawyer acted with intent. For example, if the lawyer has a history of engaging in unethical or illegal behavior, this may suggest that they intended to obstruct justice in the current case.
5. Expert Testimony: Expert witnesses may be called to testify about the lawyer’s actions and whether they are consistent with obstruction of justice.

14. What Role Do Whistleblowers Play in Uncovering Obstruction by Lawyers?

Yes, whistleblowers can play a crucial role in uncovering obstruction of justice by lawyers by reporting unethical or illegal conduct to the appropriate authorities. Their disclosures can provide critical evidence that leads to investigations and prosecutions.

Whistleblowers can include:

• Other Attorneys: Attorneys who witness unethical or illegal conduct by their colleagues have a duty to report it to the appropriate authorities, such as the bar association or law enforcement.
• Law Firm Staff: Paralegals, legal secretaries, and other law firm staff may witness obstruction of justice and can report it to the authorities.
• Clients: Clients who believe that their attorneys have engaged in unethical or illegal conduct may report it to the authorities.
• Adverse Parties: In some cases, adverse parties in a legal proceeding may become aware of obstruction of justice and report it to the authorities.

Whistleblowers often face significant risks, including retaliation, harassment, and loss of employment. However, they are protected by various laws and regulations, such as the Whistleblower Protection Act, which prohibits retaliation against federal employees who report waste, fraud, and abuse.

The information provided by whistleblowers can be invaluable in uncovering obstruction of justice and holding lawyers accountable for their actions.

15. How Does Social Media Impact Obstruction of Justice Cases Involving Lawyers?

Yes, social media can significantly impact obstruction of justice cases involving lawyers by providing a platform for evidence gathering, witness influencing, and reputational damage. Lawyers must be aware of the implications of their online activity and that of others involved in their cases.

Here’s how social media can impact these cases:

1. Evidence Gathering: Social media can be a valuable source of evidence in obstruction of justice cases. Posts, comments, and messages can provide insight into a lawyer’s intent, knowledge, and conduct.
2. Witness Influencing: Social media can be used to influence or intimidate witnesses. Lawyers or their agents may attempt to contact witnesses through social media, or they may post information online that is designed to sway their testimony.
3. Reputational Damage: Social media can be used to damage a lawyer’s reputation. Accusations of obstruction of justice can quickly spread online, leading to public criticism and loss of clients.
4. Ethical Violations: Lawyers must be careful about their social media activity to avoid ethical violations. They should not post confidential client information, make false statements, or engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.
5. Monitoring Social Media: Lawyers should monitor social media for any information that may be relevant to their cases. This may include monitoring the social media accounts of witnesses, parties, and other individuals involved in the case.

16. How Do State Laws Differ From Federal Laws on Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, state laws on obstruction of justice can differ significantly from federal laws, particularly in scope, penalties, and specific prohibited acts. Understanding these differences is crucial for lawyers practicing in different jurisdictions.

Here are some key differences:

1. Scope: Federal laws on obstruction of justice, such as 18 U.S. Code § 1503, apply to federal court proceedings and federal investigations. State laws, on the other hand, apply to state court proceedings and state investigations.
2. Specific Prohibited Acts: State laws may prohibit specific acts that are not covered by federal laws, or vice versa. For example, some states may have laws prohibiting obstruction of justice in administrative proceedings, while federal law may not cover such proceedings.
3. Penalties: The penalties for obstruction of justice can vary significantly between state and federal laws. Some states may have harsher penalties than federal law, while others may have more lenient penalties.
4. Definitions: The definition of obstruction of justice may vary between state and federal laws. Some states may have a broader definition of obstruction of justice than federal law, while others may have a narrower definition.
5. Case Law: The case law interpreting obstruction of justice laws can vary between state and federal courts. This can lead to different interpretations of the law in different jurisdictions.

17. How Are Judges and Prosecutors Held Accountable for Obstruction of Justice?

Yes, judges and prosecutors can be held accountable for obstruction of justice through various mechanisms, including disciplinary proceedings, criminal charges, and impeachment. These measures ensure that legal professionals in positions of power are also subject to the rule of law.

Here’s how they can be held accountable:

1. Disciplinary Proceedings: Judges and prosecutors are subject to disciplinary proceedings by their respective professional organizations, such as the state bar association or the judicial conduct commission. These proceedings can result in sanctions, such as suspension, censure, or removal from office.
2. Criminal Charges: Judges and prosecutors can be charged with criminal offenses, including obstruction of justice, if they engage in conduct that violates the law.
3. Impeachment: Judges can be impeached by the legislature for misconduct, including obstruction of justice.
4. Civil Lawsuits: Judges and prosecutors can be sued in civil court for damages resulting from their misconduct.

18. How Does Technology Impact a Lawyer’s Ability to Obstruct Justice?

Yes, technology can both facilitate and complicate a lawyer’s ability to obstruct justice. Digital tools can be used to conceal evidence, tamper with data, and communicate illicitly, but they also leave digital trails that can be traced by investigators.

Here’s how technology impacts a lawyer’s ability to obstruct justice:

1. Facilitating Obstruction:

   • Concealing Evidence: Lawyers can use encryption and other technologies to conceal evidence from investigators.
   • Tampering with Data: Lawyers can use computer programs to alter or delete data that is relevant to a case.
   • Communicating Illicitly: Lawyers can use encrypted messaging apps and other technologies to communicate with clients and witnesses without being detected by law enforcement.

2. Complicating Obstruction:

   • Digital Trails: Digital devices and online accounts leave digital trails that can be traced by investigators.
   • Data Recovery: Even if data is deleted or altered, it may be possible to recover it using forensic tools.
   • Surveillance: Law enforcement can use surveillance technologies to monitor lawyers’ communications and activities.

19. What Emerging Trends in Law Could Affect Obstruction of Justice Cases?

Yes, several emerging trends in law could affect obstruction of justice cases, including changes in data privacy laws, the use of artificial intelligence in legal proceedings, and evolving interpretations of ethical rules. Staying informed about these trends is crucial for legal professionals.

Here are some emerging trends in law that could affect obstruction of justice cases:

1. Data Privacy Laws: Changes in data privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), could affect how lawyers handle and protect client data.
2. Artificial Intelligence (AI): The use of AI in legal proceedings is growing, and this could have implications for obstruction of justice cases. For example, AI could be used to identify patterns of obstruction or to detect false statements.
3. Evolving Interpretations of Ethical Rules: Ethical rules are constantly evolving, and this could affect how lawyers are held accountable for their actions. For example, there may be new interpretations of the duty of confidentiality or the duty of candor.
4. Cybersecurity: As technology becomes more prevalent in the legal profession, cybersecurity becomes increasingly important. Lawyers must take steps to protect their data and systems from cyberattacks, as a data breach could lead to obstruction of justice charges.

20. How Can internetlawyers.net Help If You’re Facing Obstruction Charges?

Yes, if you’re facing obstruction charges, internetlawyers.net offers resources and connections to experienced attorneys who can provide guidance, representation, and support throughout the legal process.

Here’s how internetlawyers.net can assist:

• Informational Resources: Access articles, guides, and FAQs on obstruction of justice, legal ethics, and criminal defense.
• Attorney Directory: Find experienced criminal defense attorneys and ethics lawyers in your area who specialize in obstruction of justice cases.
• Legal Assistance: Connect with attorneys who can evaluate your case, explain your rights, and develop a defense strategy.
• Support and Guidance: Receive support and guidance throughout the legal process, including assistance with investigations, court appearances, and negotiations.

Facing obstruction charges can be daunting, but with the right legal representation and support, you can navigate the legal system effectively. Visit internetlawyers.net today to find the help you need.

FAQ: Obstruction of Justice and Lawyers

1. Can a lawyer be disbarred for obstruction of justice?
   Yes, a lawyer can be disbarred for obstruction of justice, as it is a serious ethical violation.
2. What is considered witness tampering by a lawyer?
   Witness tampering includes intimidating, threatening, or bribing a witness to alter their testimony.
3. Is it obstruction of justice to lie to a federal investigator?
   Yes, lying to a federal investigator is a crime under 18 U.S. Code § 1001.
4. How can a lawyer prove lack of intent in an obstruction case?
   A lawyer can present evidence showing their actions were unintentional or based on a misinterpretation of facts.
5. What is the duty of candor for a lawyer?
   The duty of candor requires a lawyer to be honest and truthful in dealings with the court.
6. Can a prosecutor be charged with obstruction of justice?
   Yes, prosecutors can be charged if they intentionally impede the due process of justice.
7. How does technology play a role in obstruction of justice cases?
   Technology can be used to conceal or alter evidence, but also leaves digital trails that can be traced.
8. What should a lawyer do if they suspect another lawyer is obstructing justice?
   They should report the suspected misconduct to the bar association or relevant authorities.
9. Are there defenses against obstruction charges?
   Yes, defenses include lack of intent, misinterpretation of actions, and insufficient evidence.
10. How does internetlawyers.net help those facing legal charges?
    internetlawyers.net provides resources, information, and connections to experienced attorneys.

If you’re navigating the complexities of obstruction of justice, remember that understanding your rights and responsibilities is crucial. Don’t hesitate to seek guidance from legal professionals who can help you navigate these challenging situations.

Address: 111 Broadway, New York, NY 10006, United States
Phone: +1 (212) 555-1212
Website: internetlawyers.net

Alt: A courtroom scene depicting a judge at the bench, lawyers at their tables, and a jury in the background, highlighting the setting where obstruction of justice cases are adjudicated.