Brian Murphy is a highly experienced lawyer specializing in labor and employment law. His impressive track record demonstrates a consistent ability to achieve favorable outcomes for his clients in complex litigation matters. This article highlights a selection of Brian Murphy’s successful cases, showcasing his expertise in securing dismissals, summary judgments, and injunctions across a range of employment-related disputes.
One significant area of Brian Murphy’s practice involves defending employers against post-termination commission claims. In Tal v. CompuTech International, Inc., he successfully obtained a dismissal, demonstrating his skill in navigating complex compensation disputes.
Brian Murphy also possesses notable expertise in enforcing non-compete agreements and protecting his clients’ business interests. In Excel Sports Management, LLC v. Klutch Sports Group, LLC, he secured a preliminary appellate injunction, effectively preventing a former employee from working for a competitor. This case underscores his ability to act decisively and achieve swift resolutions in competitive business environments.
Furthermore, Brian Murphy has a strong record of defending employers against discrimination claims. He secured summary judgment in Hossain v. Manhattan Sheraton Corp., dismissing age, race, and national origin claims. His success extends to cases involving various discrimination allegations, including those under the ADEA, Title VII, New York State Law, and New York City Law, illustrating his comprehensive understanding of anti-discrimination legislation. Similarly, he obtained summary judgment in Quinones v. Stuart Weitzman, LLC, dismissing claims related to the Fair Credit Reporting Act and California State Law, showcasing his ability to handle cases with intricate regulatory aspects.
Brian Murphy’s litigation skills are further exemplified in his defense against preliminary injunctions. In Long Island Anesthesia Physicians LLP v. Wagner, et al, he successfully defeated a motion for a preliminary injunction, allowing his client to continue their professional activities unimpeded.
His experience extends to workers’ compensation and related tort claims. In Robertson v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc., et al., Brian Murphy secured summary judgment, dismissing tort claims based on the “special employer” and “intentional wrong” standards under the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act.
Brian Murphy has also achieved significant victories in wage and hour class action litigation. He successfully denied class certification and granted decertification in Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., in a case centered on misclassification theory. His expertise in wage and hour law is further demonstrated in Echavarria v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., where he secured summary judgment and denial of class certification based on independent contractor status arguments.
Brian Murphy’s consistent success in obtaining summary judgments is evident across numerous cases, including Twomey v. Quad/Graphics, Inc. (breach of contract, age and national origin discrimination), Nolley v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp. (race discrimination and retaliation), Jaafari v. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (multiple discrimination claims and whistleblowing), Turowski v. Triarc Companies, Inc. (disability discrimination), Connolly v. The TJX Companies, Inc. (hostile work environment and retaliation), Perugini v. Stryker Orthopaedics (age discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation), and DeLuca v. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (age and national origin discrimination).
In addition, Brian Murphy has demonstrated skill in enforcing arbitration agreements and dismissing claims at an early stage. In Whitt v. Prosper Funding LLC, he successfully compelled arbitration and secured the dismissal of a disability discrimination claim. He also obtained dismissals in Dominguez v. Costco Wholesale Corp. and Gimello v. Costco Wholesale Corp. in cases involving the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act (whistleblowing claims).
Brian Murphy’s extensive case history and consistent success rate highlight his deep understanding of labor and employment law and his effectiveness as a litigator. His experience encompasses a wide range of employment disputes, making him a strong advocate for his clients’ interests.
