The mid-1990s witnessed one of the most sensational trials in American legal history, and at its heart was Leslie Abramson, a New York City-born lawyer renowned for her formidable courtroom presence. She became a household name as the defense attorney for Erik Menendez, one half of the infamous Menendez brothers, accused of the brutal murder of their parents in their Beverly Hills mansion. The gripping case of Lyle and Erik Menendez transfixed the nation, and Abramson’s passionate defense of Erik cemented her status as a legal force to be reckoned with. Despite her efforts, both brothers were ultimately convicted in 1996 for the 1989 double murder and continue to serve life sentences, a stark reminder of the tragedy that unfolded.
The Menendez saga continues to captivate the public imagination, so much so that it inspired Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders. This compelling series, available for streaming on Peacock, features Emmy and Golden Globe winner Edie Falco portraying the tenacious Leslie Abramson. Falco’s portrayal brings Abramson’s unwavering dedication to her client into sharp focus, reigniting interest in the real-life lawyer and prompting many to ask: Where is Leslie Abramson today?
RELATED: Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders Is Now Streaming On Peacock — What to Know
Leslie Abramson during the intense Menendez brothers trial in Los Angeles, photographed outside the courthouse.
What Became of Leslie Abramson?
At 81 years old, Leslie Abramson maintains a relatively private life. Her career as a lawyer, as documented by The State Bar of California, began in 1970 and spanned several decades until 2013. After a brief period of inactivity, she was listed as active again in 2018 before returning to inactive status on June 1, 2023. Her last known practice was at the Law Office of Leslie H. Abramson in Monrovia, Los Angeles County, California.
Despite her low profile, Abramson briefly stepped back into the public eye on October 9, 2024, during an interview with Entertainment Tonight. Her candid remarks targeted the Ryan Murphy series Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story, which she dismissed as “a piece of sh-t,” admitting she refused to watch it. True to her professional ethics, when questioned about the Menendez case itself, Abramson firmly stated, “I will make no comments about my client. None whatsoever,” demonstrating her enduring commitment to client confidentiality.
The Formative Years of a Criminal Defense Icon
Leslie Abramson during the high-stakes Menendez brothers trial in Los Angeles courtroom, displaying her characteristic focus and determination.
Born in Queens, New York City in 1943, Leslie Abramson’s early life was shaped by the absence of her father, leaving her to be raised by her mother and grandmother, as detailed by The Washington Post. Before her move to Los Angeles in 1964, she married and had a daughter. This first marriage ended in divorce.
Later, Abramson married Los Angeles Times reporter Tim Rutten, and together they adopted a son, according to People. Their marriage also concluded in divorce in 2007.
Abramson’s legal journey began with a law degree from UCLA. She honed her skills as a public defender for six years, quickly earning a reputation for her assertive style and uncompromising approach – traits described by The Washington Post as “take-no-prisoners tactics.” This formidable approach served her well as she transitioned into private practice.
Her legal acumen was widely recognized. In 1985, Abramson achieved a milestone, becoming the first woman named Outstanding Trial Attorney by the Los Angeles Criminal Courts Bar Association, as reported in a June 23, 1989 Los Angeles Times article. Intriguingly, this accolade came just before the tragic Menendez murders in August 1989. The Los Angeles Times article itself foreshadowed her future prominence, aptly titled “The Defender: Some Say Leslie Abramson Is the Best Female Criminal Defense Lawyer Around. Others Say She’s the Best, Period.”
Prior to the Menendez case, Abramson’s career was marked by defending complex and high-profile cases. She represented Brian Hale, whose murder conviction for the deaths of two elderly men was overturned due to mental incompetency. Another notable case involved Dr. Khalid Parwez, a gynecologist accused of the gruesome murder of his 11-year-old son. Despite the horrific nature of the accusations, Dr. Parwez was subsequently acquitted, further highlighting Abramson’s effectiveness as a defense lawyer.
A staunch opponent of the death penalty, Abramson, in her own words to The Washington Post, dedicated her career to being a “4-foot-11, fire-eating, mudslinging, nuclear-strength pain in the legal butt.” This self-description encapsulates her fierce advocacy and relentless pursuit of justice for her clients.
In 1990, renowned journalist Dominick Dunne, writing for Vanity Fair, lauded Abramson as “considered to be the most brilliant Los Angeles defense lawyer for death-row cases,” underscoring her exceptional reputation within the legal community.
Even before the Menendez case propelled her to national fame, Abramson demonstrated her capability in difficult cases. In 1988, she successfully defended 17-year-old Arnel Salvatierra, who was initially charged with first-degree murder for fatally shooting his father in 1986. By bringing abuse allegations to light, Abramson secured a conviction for voluntary manslaughter and probation for Salvatierra, as reported by Dunne. This victory foreshadowed the defense strategy she would later employ in the Menendez case.
It was with this formidable background that Leslie Abramson took on the case of Erik Menendez, hoping for a similar outcome to her previous successes.
RELATED: The Gabby Petito-Brian-Laundrie Case, Explained
Leslie Abramson: Lead Attorney for Erik Menendez
A comparative image showing Edie Falco embodying Leslie Abramson in “Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders” alongside a photo of the actual lawyer Leslie Abramson.
Leslie Abramson’s representation of Erik Menendez catapulted her to national prominence. Her role in the 1993 trial, where the brothers were tried together but with separate juries, became a defining moment in her career, even earning a satirical sketch on Saturday Night Live. Abramson’s strategy hinged on arguing that the brothers were driven to kill their parents after enduring years of severe physical and sexual abuse. This defense, though controversial, resonated with many and continues to fuel public debate about the complexities of the case.
The first trial ended with a hung jury for Erik Menendez. According to The Washington Post, Erik’s jury was split along gender lines: the women favored manslaughter, while the men leaned towards murder charges. This division highlighted the emotional and societal impact of Abramson’s defense.
Reflecting on the case, Abramson told The Washington Post, “I’ve represented people charged with murder for 27 years, and these guys just don’t measure up to anybody else I’ve ever represented. These are not murderers. These are troubled kids in a very difficult and grotesque home environment, and they cracked.” Her words underscored her belief in her client’s diminished culpability due to extreme circumstances.
Following the mistrials of 1993, the Menendez brothers faced a second trial in 1995. However, in this trial, evidence regarding the alleged abuse was significantly restricted, weakening Abramson’s defense. In 1996, both Lyle and Erik Menendez were found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, where they remain today.
Abramson reacted to the verdict with dismay, telling The Washington Post, “It’s a grotesquely disproportionate verdict and punishment for what happened here. When children kill their parents, something is wrong in that family. It’s a different moral mix for a sexual predator, those who kill strangers. They really are a scourge of society… This is a different degree of moral awfulness.” She consistently argued for a nuanced understanding of parricide, distinct from other forms of murder.
Post-trial, Abramson faced scrutiny herself. She was investigated for allegedly asking a psychiatrist to alter his notes related to the case. However, The New York Times reported that the District Attorney’s Office declined to prosecute due to insufficient evidence. Similarly, the California Bar dropped its inquiry into misconduct charges, clearing Abramson of any formal wrongdoing.
Nearly three decades later, public sentiment towards the Menendez brothers has shifted, with a growing wave of support fueled by renewed scrutiny of evidence pointing to José Menendez’s alleged abuse. This resurgence of interest has led to a scheduled hearing on December 11, 2024, raising hopes among supporters for a potential re-evaluation of the case.
Life Beyond the Menendez Trial for Leslie Abramson
Lyle and Erik Menendez in Beverly Hills Municipal Court, March 1990, attentively listening to the judge during a court session.
In 1997, Leslie Abramson chronicled her extensive career, including the Menendez case, in her memoir, The Defense is Ready: Life in the Trenches of Criminal Law, published by Simon & Schuster. The book offers readers an in-depth look into the high-stakes world of criminal law through Abramson’s experiences. The book description highlights its aim to provide “a stunning firsthand account of how the courage and timidity, wisdom and folly, selflessness and venality of real lawyers, judges, victims and defendants are interwoven into the complex fabric of our often frustrating criminal justice system.”
Abramson returned to the courtroom in 2004 to defend music producer Phil Spector, stepping in after a mistrial and replacing Robert Shapiro, famously part of O.J. Simpson’s defense team, as reported by The Los Angeles Times. Despite Abramson’s efforts, Spector was eventually found guilty, although this occurred after Abramson was replaced by another defense attorney, according to NBC News.
More recently, in October 2024, the documentary The Menendez Brothers included an email from Abramson, revealing her reluctance to re-engage publicly with the case that brought her into the limelight, as reported by Entertainment Tonight.
“30 years is a long time,” she wrote regarding the Menendez brothers’ trial. “I’d like to leave the past in the past. No amount of media, nor teenage petitions will alter the fate of these clients. Only the court can do that, and they have ruled.” Her statement reflects a desire to move on from a case that, while pivotal in her career, remains a deeply complex and emotionally charged chapter.
For those seeking a deeper understanding of Abramson’s role in the Menendez case, Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders, with Edie Falco’s portrayal of the lawyer, is available for streaming on Peacock. The series offers a dramatized yet compelling exploration of this landmark trial and the lawyer who stood at its center.
